工农配比联动销售方案 · 渠道与商会市场调研问卷Agriculture–Industrial Linked Land Investment Model · Channel & Chamber of Commerce Survey

本问卷用于了解合作渠道与商会机构对本项目的认知度与合作/投资意愿,所有信息仅用于内部市场调研,不作为其他用途。This survey is for internal market research purposes only, to assess awareness and willingness to cooperate/invest. Information will not be used for other purposes.

项目概要(点击展开)Project Summary (tap to expand)
产品名称Product 工农配比联动土地权益认购(投资合伙人共益模式,非渠道分销)Agriculture–Industrial Linked Land Subscription (Investment-Partner Profit-Sharing Model, not a sales-commission/distribution structure)
硬性配比Ratio 农业:工业 = 1:4(1公顷农业配2500㎡工业)Agricultural : Industrial = 1:4 (1ha agri. unlocks 2,500㎡ industrial)
农业地定价Agri. Price $3/㎡,起投1公顷 = $30,000$3/sqm, minimum subscription 1ha = $30,000
工业地定价Industrial Price $20/㎡,2500㎡权益价值 $50,000$20/sqm, 2,500sqm equity valued at $50,000
两种客户路径Two Client Paths ① 自用型客户:认购农地后,若本人需实际持有、自用/出租/转让工业用地,须补齐差价取得完整产权;② 投资合伙人型客户:不自用工业用地,而是作为合伙人参与工业用地成交与收益分配,无需补齐差价A) Self-use client: after subscribing agricultural land, if the client wants to personally hold/use/lease/transfer the industrial land, must pay the price gap to obtain full title. B) Investment-partner client: does not use the industrial land personally, but participates as a partner in its sale/profit-sharing — no top-up payment required.
客户补差价(仅自用型)Top-up Payment (Self-use Only) $20,000(工业地差价,仅当客户选择自持工业用地时缴纳);投资合伙人不缴纳此差价,改为按约定比例参与工业用地成交收益分配$20,000 industrial land price gap — payable only if the client chooses to personally hold the industrial land. Investment-partner clients do not pay this; instead they share in transaction proceeds per the agreed ratio.
单套资产总值(自用型)Total Asset Value (Self-use) $80,000(农地$30,000 + 工业地权益$50,000)$80,000 (agri. $30,000 + industrial equity $50,000)
收益保障·模式一Guarantee Model 1 认购总价5%/年固定补贴(年限待定)5%/year fixed subsidy on subscription value (term TBD)
收益保障·模式二Guarantee Model 2 工业用地40%留存权益,10年分期对冲40% retained industrial equity, offset over 10-year installments
客户最差情形保底Worst-Case Guarantee 即便补贴/权益对冲机制均未兑现,客户仍无偿永久持有12500㎡农业+工业用地完整产权,可自用、出租或转让,资金零亏损;若公司未履约(未完成确权、基础配套或种植),客户可单方解约,无需退还任何已获权益,公司无追索权Even if neither the subsidy nor the equity-offset mechanism is honored, the client permanently retains full ownership of 12,500sqm of agricultural + industrial land (usable, leasable, or transferable) with zero capital loss. If the company fails to perform (title issuance, infrastructure, or planting), the client may unilaterally exit without returning any benefits received, and the company has no recourse.
证照保障Title Guarantee 农地全款到账即确权;工业地独立确权,双地块分属两家公司Agricultural title issued on full payment; industrial land separately titled under a different company
投资合伙人权益分配Partner Profit-Sharing 本产品无第三方渠道分销,合伙人以共同投资/共同促成成交方式参与,按角色分配工业用地成交收益:合伙人自主促成成交,合伙人享有该笔收益60%,公司留存40%;公司主导对接促成,合伙人与公司各分50%No third-party sales-commission channel. Partners participate as co-investors/deal co-facilitators and share industrial-land transaction proceeds by role: Partner-sourced & closed deal: Partner 60% / company 40%; Company-led closing: 50/50 split.

一、受访者信息1. Respondent Information

二、调查问卷2. Survey Questionnaire

1. 您/贵机构此前是否了解过柬埔寨“工农配比联动”土地投资项目?Have you/your organization heard of this Cambodia Agriculture–Industrial Linked land investment project before?
2. 您如何评价该项目“农业:工业=1:4”配比模式的市场认可度?How would you rate market acceptance of the 1:4 agriculture-to-industrial land ratio model?
3. 您认为该项目“固定年化补贴/权益对冲”两种收益保障机制的可信度如何?How credible do you find the two income-guarantee mechanisms (fixed annual subsidy / equity offset)?
4. 该项目“客户最差情形仍保留全部土地资产、零资金亏损”的兜底承诺,对您的客户/会员吸引力如何?How attractive is the guarantee that clients retain full land assets with zero capital loss even in the worst case?
5. 您认为“自用型客户补齐$20,000差价、合伙人型客户无需补差价”的双路径设计是否清晰合理?Is the two-path design (self-use clients pay the $20,000 top-up; partner clients don't) clear and reasonable?
6. 您认为该项目的定价(农地$3/㎡,工业地$20/㎡)是否具备市场竞争力?Do you consider the pricing ($3/sqm agricultural, $20/sqm industrial) competitive in the current market?
7. 作为投资合伙人,您更倾向于哪种收益分配方式?As an investment partner, which profit-sharing arrangement would you prefer?
8. 贵机构/您本人是否有意愿协助向会员企业或潜在客户介绍该项目?Would your organization/you be willing to help introduce this project to member companies or potential clients?
9. 若考虑合作,您认为最需要优先核实/解决的问题是?(可多选)If considering cooperation, which issues need priority verification? (multiple choice)
10. 贵机构/您本人更倾向于以哪种身份参与该项目?Which role would your organization/you prefer when participating in this project?
11. 您对该项目还有哪些建议或顾虑,希望我们优先说明或补充?Any additional suggestions or concerns you would like us to address or clarify?